Business law Assignment Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2000 words

Business law - Assignment instanceIn this context, what LaMance points out is relevant. consort to him, a hotel has to recurrence a set of legal measures to avoid liability. If the hotel attention fails to take adequate measures to ensure the safety of its guests, then the hotel centering would be held liable for its negligent acts. First, the hotel management should be able to anticipate possible safety threats within the hotel environment. If the hotel is really cognizant of the degree of inspiration of criminal acts, it can take adequate safety measures to address those issues. As LakMance proposes, the hotel management can effect surveillance cameras or hire more security guards to ensure the safety of guests and their valuables. In addition to anticipating riskiness factors, the hotel should communicate proper warning to guests to even up them aware of the safety threats identified. Finally, hotels have also the responsibility to put forward their properties properly. To illustrate, easy access windows and faulty door locks may sometimes assist criminals to break into rooms. Hence, the hotel management has to figure out certain that its properties are managed properly. In the Freda case, there is a possibility to argue that the Gullies Hotel management did not take adequate measures to ensure the safety of the guests valuable even though the management has been aware of the theft issues within the hotel environment. However, it must be noted that the Gullies management had arranged special facilities at the response for keeping the valuables of their clients. Despite theft warning and special security facilities, Freda left the hotel leaving cash and high-priced jewelries in her room and this negligence resulted in the theft of her valuables. Question 2 The article of belief of precedent is atomic number 53 of the fundamental and oldest features of the English legal system. In addition, it is considered to be the heart of the common law sys tem. The doctrine of precedent states that a decision made by a court in one case is back on other courts in later cases involving kindred facts (as qtd in Harris199). The most potential benefit of the doctrine of precedent is that it promotes uniformity within the law. More precisely, it meets the general conception of justice by treating similar cases in the similar manner. The basic concepts of the doctrine of precedent have been well stated and are easy to understand. According to this doctrine, as Harris points out, all courts must adhere to the previous decisions made by superior courts in similar cases. The second rule of the doctrine of precedent sates that current decisions made by courts will be employ to all future cases which have similar facts (199-200). However, law experts argue that this feature may lead to translation difficulties for the courts. As discussed already, adherence to precedent is helpful to maintain a system of stable laws, which in procedure prom otes the predictability of laws and provides individuals with a greater degree of security. As legal advisors point out, the doctrine of precedent is essential to make certain that laws develop in accordance with changing views of the society only and hence laws clearly ponder morals and expectations of the society as well. Since the doctrine of